You know, I was raised by a particularly intelligent woman. And I’m not just saying that because she sometimes reads this blog either. She already knows it, and false modesty isn’t a sin in which she partakes. This, by the way, is the disclaimer part of the post. I do it often. You’d think that being bitter for so long I’d have ceased to care who I offend, but it just hasnt’ worked out that way. So, Mom, this one isn’t your fault. Or, well, really it is, but let’s both blame someone else and then talk about them behind their back.
I grew up believing that romance novels are trashy. Yes, I can hear you all saying, “But they ARE” all the way over here, but think about it. Really? What’s trashy about them? Are they badly written? Some, yes, but not all by any stretch. Jane Eyre isn’t anything but a very old romance novel, and no one calls it trashy. Well, you say, but it’s a classic! A classic is just something that’s survived. Like me. Not all classics (unlike me) are really any good. Try reading Moby Dick and then tell me with a straight face that you enjoyed it.
So if it isn’t the quality of writing that makes it trashy, what is it? The cover art? Yes, some is laughably bad. I love the spoofs on the Longmire website, one of which I’ve shamelessly stolen here. So we do often judge books by their covers, which is another reason I’m pretty happy that I now own a Sony Book Reader, because I can read whatever the france I want and nobody gets to judge me for it.
But sci-fi and fantasy are also riddled with bad cover art, but no one says “Trashy” before the phrase “Sci Fi” or rolls their eyes they way you’ll get if you tell someone you have just finished a good romance novel.
So, I decided to test my prejudices and I’ve started downloading romance books. I blame Charlaine Harris, actually. I fell in love with the TV series True Blood on HBO (watched on the web because it hasn’t come out in the UK yet, dammit), and have since read all her Sookie Stackhouse novels. Actually… I read all 8 of them in about 2 weeks. Seriously. And I don’t even LIKE vampire stories. Talk about trashy. I get images of Béla Lugosi and get the giggles. Sorry, Anne Rice, but even if you take the comical aspect away, how on earth is cannibalism sexy? Tell me that? Anyway, that’s another rant altogether.
Anyway, I could go on and on about what makes romance trashy, and by now you’re probably worried that I will. Either that or you’re shouting “Too Late!” at your monitor. I’ll skip it all and get to the point.
Write this one down, Ethel. It’s the s-e-x. If men talk about sex it’s bawdy and perhaps coarse, but boys will be boys. If women talk about sex… and I’m talking about grown women here… it’s trashy? It’s trashy to write about it, read about it, and for gods sake, don’t think about it either! That leads down a path of decay! Or maybe it’s just that most romance books deal with love and relationships. By god that IS trashy!
Because I’ve been reading a few romance books lately…. probably… 40 books in the last 4 months. (I’ve got a lot of catching up to do… Jane Eyre was the last one I’d read!) Some historical, some modern, some futuristic and a couple paranormal (that’s what they call vampires and ghosts these days.) And I will tell you… some were really crap. No doubt about that. But there were a few that made me laugh out loud, got me misty eyed, and even made my pulse go a wee bit faster. But guess what…. none of them were trashy. Imagine that.
It depends what you mean by “trashy”. I describe a lot of SF as trashy. I tend to use it to mean either “so appallingly written it made me laugh” or “unmemorable yet pleasantly entertaining”. Quite a lot of romance novels fall into one of those categories. I don’t use the term in the American way to mean “slutty” or “cheap”.
Good, lightweight entertaining novels are a wonderful thing, and they’re a lot harder to write than most people think. In my mind, there’s not a lot of difference in quality or skill between a male-oriented run of the mill thriller by someone like Jack Higgins (who is a great bloke and one of my favourite authors) and a female-oriented romance. It’s just the subject matter and target audience. But whereas Higgins regularly tops bestseller lists, romantic authors are derided. Maybe that’s just publishers for you.
It’s much the same in the film world, where the “chick flick” is a patronising term. “Real” films have real men with guns and cars and fighting, don’t they? Well, tell that to the guys looking at the box office receipts for Mamma Mia.
So, enjoy your romantic novels unashamedly, Jayne.
[ Follow me on Twitter: MattKelland ]
Good Gawd——I turn my literary back for a minute and you are reading TRASH! Saints preserve us!
And you take back what you said about Jane Ayre—that’s—-that’s LITERATURE.
…and clean up your room….Love, Mom
This was a really great post. It made me think about my own motivations for avoiding romance novels….but, I’ve always been a fan of erotic fiction – I think I just prefer more violent erotic fiction.
Anyway, you really have a great point when you say that it is most likely the fact that women are writing – and reading – about sex that makes people say it’s “trashy.”
It is really great post.
Maxcy