<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trashy Romance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indiadrummond.com/2008/12/31/trashy-romance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indiadrummond.com/2008/12/31/trashy-romance/</link>
	<description>Welcome to the official site of India Drummond - urban fantasy, sci-fi, and romance author. Ordinary Angels, her debut novel, comes out April 2011!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 22:13:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: http://girlsforum.com</title>
		<link>http://www.indiadrummond.com/2008/12/31/trashy-romance/comment-page-1/#comment-572</link>
		<dc:creator>http://girlsforum.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 21:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggerbingo.com/bitterwomen/2008/12/31/trashy-romance/#comment-572</guid>
		<description>It is really great post.

Maxcy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is really great post.</p>
<p>Maxcy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sassy Sexpert</title>
		<link>http://www.indiadrummond.com/2008/12/31/trashy-romance/comment-page-1/#comment-569</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sassy Sexpert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggerbingo.com/bitterwomen/2008/12/31/trashy-romance/#comment-569</guid>
		<description>This was a really great post. It made me think about my own motivations for avoiding romance novels....but, I&#039;ve always been a fan of erotic fiction - I think I just prefer more violent erotic fiction.

Anyway, you really have a great point when you say that it is most likely the fact that women are writing - and reading - about sex that makes people say it&#039;s &quot;trashy.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a really great post. It made me think about my own motivations for avoiding romance novels&#8230;.but, I&#8217;ve always been a fan of erotic fiction &#8211; I think I just prefer more violent erotic fiction.</p>
<p>Anyway, you really have a great point when you say that it is most likely the fact that women are writing &#8211; and reading &#8211; about sex that makes people say it&#8217;s &#8220;trashy.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yo' Momma</title>
		<link>http://www.indiadrummond.com/2008/12/31/trashy-romance/comment-page-1/#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator>Yo' Momma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggerbingo.com/bitterwomen/2008/12/31/trashy-romance/#comment-571</guid>
		<description>Good Gawd------I turn my literary back for a minute and you are reading TRASH! Saints preserve us!

And you take back what you said about Jane Ayre---that&#039;s----that&#039;s LITERATURE.

...and clean up your room....Love, Mom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Gawd&#8212;&#8212;I turn my literary back for a minute and you are reading TRASH! Saints preserve us!</p>
<p>And you take back what you said about Jane Ayre&#8212;that&#8217;s&#8212;-that&#8217;s LITERATURE.</p>
<p>&#8230;and clean up your room&#8230;.Love, Mom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Kelland</title>
		<link>http://www.indiadrummond.com/2008/12/31/trashy-romance/comment-page-1/#comment-570</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Kelland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 10:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggerbingo.com/bitterwomen/2008/12/31/trashy-romance/#comment-570</guid>
		<description>It depends what you mean by &quot;trashy&quot;.  I describe a lot of SF as trashy.  I tend to use it to mean either &quot;so appallingly written it made me laugh&quot; or &quot;unmemorable yet pleasantly entertaining&quot;. Quite a lot of romance novels fall into one of those categories.  I don&#039;t use the term in the American way to mean &quot;slutty&quot; or &quot;cheap&quot;.

Good, lightweight entertaining novels are a wonderful thing, and they&#039;re a lot harder to write than most people think.  In my mind, there&#039;s not a lot of difference in quality or skill between a male-oriented run of the mill thriller by someone like Jack Higgins (who is a great bloke and one of my favourite authors) and a female-oriented romance.  It&#039;s just the subject matter and target audience. But whereas Higgins regularly tops bestseller lists, romantic authors are derided.  Maybe that&#039;s just publishers for you.

It&#039;s much the same in the film world, where the &quot;chick flick&quot; is a patronising term. &quot;Real&quot; films have real men with guns and cars and fighting, don&#039;t they?  Well, tell that to the guys looking at the box office receipts for Mamma Mia.

So, enjoy your romantic novels unashamedly, Jayne.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It depends what you mean by &#8220;trashy&#8221;.  I describe a lot of SF as trashy.  I tend to use it to mean either &#8220;so appallingly written it made me laugh&#8221; or &#8220;unmemorable yet pleasantly entertaining&#8221;. Quite a lot of romance novels fall into one of those categories.  I don&#8217;t use the term in the American way to mean &#8220;slutty&#8221; or &#8220;cheap&#8221;.</p>
<p>Good, lightweight entertaining novels are a wonderful thing, and they&#8217;re a lot harder to write than most people think.  In my mind, there&#8217;s not a lot of difference in quality or skill between a male-oriented run of the mill thriller by someone like Jack Higgins (who is a great bloke and one of my favourite authors) and a female-oriented romance.  It&#8217;s just the subject matter and target audience. But whereas Higgins regularly tops bestseller lists, romantic authors are derided.  Maybe that&#8217;s just publishers for you.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s much the same in the film world, where the &#8220;chick flick&#8221; is a patronising term. &#8220;Real&#8221; films have real men with guns and cars and fighting, don&#8217;t they?  Well, tell that to the guys looking at the box office receipts for Mamma Mia.</p>
<p>So, enjoy your romantic novels unashamedly, Jayne.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

