Bias? Really?

Oct 18, 2009

Bias? Really?

I was clicking through some news links a friend on Twitter sent me a couple of days back, and I came upon a headline that read: “I thought I died’: Vic of savage gay-bias attack speaks out.”

That link led me to the article (one the same NY Daily News) which was more sensibly titled: ‘I thought I died’: Gay man Jack Price, beaten in Queens, talks about attack.

There’s not a huge difference between the two, but the word that caught my eye was bias. Bias? Really?

Down a few lines under pictures of Mr. Price with tubes coming out of him, his face battered and beaten, I read this: “Daniel Rodriguez, 21, and pal Daniel Aleman, 26, the two goons cops say were captured on surveillance video repeatedly punching, kicking and stomping on Price, have been charged with felony assault as a hate crime.”

Hate crime. I have found that a few of those I know are reluctant with the term, perhaps because they don’t approve of the person with whom Mr. Price has chosen to spend his life?

This crime might have been motivated by a lot of things, but it wasn’t bias. Bias is a tendency, a distortion, a curve or a bulge or an obliquely diagonal manner. It’s a way of cutting fabric to get a nice, flattering drape.

It wasn’t a tendency that caused these thugs to commit what we in Britain call “Grievous Bodily Harm”. It might seem like a small thing, but it matters. Words mean things, and hate has consequences.

I think we all run into little leaks of hate: in politics for example or even in little moments of spite in which people sometimes indulge. Some people stew in it and spew it to hurt people they feel superior to (or sometimes inferior to — depending on their particular neurosis). Some people let it move them to horrific violence.

But let’s call it what it is: hate, pure and simple, and not allow ourselves to feel better by pretending it was just a difference of opinion, even if it was savage.

Someday we will overcome, to quote a great civil rights hero. We can overcome hate, but not until we face it.

Related Posts

Tags

Share This

1 Comment

  1. I agree 100% that words have meanings; even small children know that. Angry parent to jelly-smeared kid, “Have you been eating before supper again?” Kid, “No, I just had a little snack.”

    Up the ante a kajillion percent and a startled friend or relative asks, “Are you prejudiced against [fill in the blank]?” Answer: “No. Some of my best friends are [fill in the blank].” We’ve all heard that CYA response, as though having a friend who is this or that is somehow an inoculation rendering one incapable of hate-motivated criminal behavior. It is called equivocation, in the jelly incident; it is changing the subject in the second.

    Richard Rodriguez, Sr., a retired city corrections officer and father of one of the attackers wanted the blame deflected from his son to him, alleging, “I caused him [Price] the harm the minute I stopped being a father to my son.”

    Rodriguez sister, Christina Rodriguez, claims that her brother’s acts were not a hate crime because they have gay relatives and Richard “even once had a gay roommate.”

    What’s up with this family anyway? In his 21 years, how many times have they covered for Junior’s bad decisions, bailed him out, equivocated for him?

    If this had been a couple of white guys assaulting a person of another race, the vitriol in that Hate Crime might be easier to see. And, yes, in racial crimes we’ve all heard parents and siblings try to excuse the act. If they want to share the blame, maybe a cell with three bunks could be found. Words mean things. Absolutely. So do actions!

    [ Follow me on Twitter: ]